Gibran Sheikh
Professor Macklin
English 115
2 November 2012
Modern
Chivalry: A Decline to the Gentleman’s Code
Modern
chivalry, the code of male ethics, is one of the abstract concepts in life that
some males abide to; and for those clueless as to what modern chivalry is, it
is a simple male gesture of courteousness. Modern day society claims it no
longer has use for a man’s chivalry and that the concept has ultimately
diminished, but in reality, chivalry is an idea that is still presented through
modern day media and communication. That is, chivalry may not be as dead as
society claims it to be. Presently the concept of chivalry has noticeably disappeared
in society because it has been claimed to be “dead”; however, there are many
images, modern world factors, and media in general that bring chivalry back
from the dead, because they all appeal to it in ways uncertain to others.
In
a blog post by a blogger known as “Precious Pat”, there is an image that displays
the decline in chivalry (the creator is unknown and will simply be referred to
as “the creator”). It depicts a couple, the man in the couple has his gaze
fixed on another woman passing by, while the woman in the couple has a thought
bubble; in it she thinks about a princely gentleman with a rose for her at her
window. Whether the couple is married, or has children is questionable, but
either way the image brings up the concept of chivalry. Messages that the
creator of the image wanted to depict are possibly that men aren’t how they
used to be and the knights in shining armor simply aren’t there anymore, both
relating to chivalry. The creator of the image has certain appeals to the terms
that oppose chivalry, and also towards how chivalry is applied into different
settings, broadening the concept, and making it more common.
Taking a look at
history, in the Encyclopedia Britannica, it is stated that chivalry was the
class that deemed a young man a knight. From there the term chivalry changed
its definition to what most people in society understand it as today: courtesy
(Encyclopedia Britannica). Going back to the image described, it is a princely
gentleman whom the woman in the couple dreams of. In this case the male in the
couple lacks chivalry, as he is not a gentleman in the eyes of his girlfriend. Modern
chivalry, courteousness, seems to be a crucial element in the image, as it is a
factor amongst others which radiates from it, and in the case the chivalric
decline, it really contradicts it. This image seems to claim that chivalry that
sparks a meaningful relationship. In the image’s relation to society, if
chivalry had been forsaken, in turn true gentlemen would also be forsaken. As a
result the image not only appeals to chivalry as a historical viewpoint that is
compatible with modern society, but it also reintroduces chivalry as a lacking,
but positive factor, in an unhappy relationship.
The creator of the
image also seems to relate to how the image may depict a man that is defined by
having something other than chivalry. A term that has since been manipulated by
the internet and the mass media that may be what the creator depicts is the
term “swag”. In the 2012 modern day society, it is evident through media that
men may choose to live with the so-called swag. Men with nothing but swag, as
internet slang defines it, are men who display disrespect, inconsideration of
others, and absolute discourtesy. Of course there were original definitions of
the term swag; however, modern day media and communication have drastically
changed the diction meaning of the word, also giving it a negative connotation.
In the image, the man seems to display swag, and therefore his girlfriend or
wife appears sad, unhappy, and wishing she had someone else to be with. It is
in this image that people can see the appeals towards the comeback of chivalry
in the modern world.
The creator of the
image also relates it to how chivalry plays a strong part in keeping a marriage,
the union of two select individuals. Chivalry can appear as a positive additive
in a marriage because not only does a man show respect to his wife, but the two
learn to communicate better and learn to care for each other. In some cases
there is, amongst other things, an absence in chivalry in some marriages. In
this case there is a divorce, a split between the union of two individuals. The
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) states a divorce rate that is half
as high as the marriage rate in the United States. With that statistic, it
appears difficult for men and women both to find someone to their liking. Referring
back to the image described, the man and woman may be on road to divorce, which
in turn presents chivalry as something that would halt that divorce. Marriage
and divorce could definitely be a side-factor to chivalry, which brings
chivalry up to a new level of audience, like married couples.
In the image,
there also seems to be a lack of dependence on the male, something the creator
may have touched upon as well. Dependence on men is also a factor of chivalry,
which seems to be another part that the image touches upon. Dependence on men
can mean anything from being a father or working to support a family. For
example, the United States Census Bureau claims that there is an increase in
the number of stay-at-home fathers, nearly double that of what it used to be in
the past decade. That being said, it is apparent that some men today aren’t the
ones in the workplace; however, men are the ones taking care of the children,
another important job. It used to be that the men bring home the bacon, the
women cook the bacon, and the children eat the bacon; but this idea doesn’t
seem to pertain to some families in the modern day society. It seems that in a
modern society, dependence on man has changed and therefore possibly chivalry
has changed as well. In other words, the man may lack chivalry because he may
be unsupportive to his family and wife no matter what job he has. These small
aspects of the image are what direct chivalry to the modern world, correlating
it with modern day society.
Another
factor of chivalry that is brought up by the image is how the man seems to also
lack courteousness; something important to chivalry used in many different
places, on many occasions. Taking courteousness to the dining room, it was
formerly proper that when men and women dined, women would be served first, and
men last, giving the idea that the man was ultimately responsible for the bill.
Presently, however, we see that while some restaurants may still follow this
basis of servitude, others may choose to serve men and women in matters they
choose, and in the end anyone may be responsible for the bill, or they may “go
Dutch”. Here is see a reason as to how society may see a downfall in chivalry;
however, society must acknowledge the fact that certain situations may not call
for chivalry. This doesn’t necessarily mean chivalry has died out; it just
simply wasn’t a factor involved. Either way, chivalry is still being a concept
discussed therefore it truly has not died out.
Modern
chivalry is a concept that seems to be falling away from modern day society. It
is an abstract concept derived by “gentlemen” to serve as a basis for the male
code of life. Not all men go by it, but those who do are those who warm the
hearts of others; however, it is notable that modern day society has seen a
decline and overall “death” in chivalry. It is up to modern day society to look
more deeply into certain pieces of media to really realize that chivalry is not
such a “dying” concept after all. Society should not be so certain to claim
that the abstract concept of chivalry has become obsolete; it has just begun to
impact the world.
Works
Cited
"2010
Census." 2010Census.gov. U.S. Census Bureau, n.d. Web. 18 Oct.
2012. <http://2010.census.gov/2010census/>.
"Chivalry."
Britannica.com. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 18 Oct. 2012.
<http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/113409/chivalry>.
"Marriage
and Divorce." Www.cdc.gov. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
29 Mar. 2012. Web. 18 Oct. 2012.
<http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/divorce.htm>.
"Modern
Chivalry." ChivalryNow.net. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Oct. 2012.
<http://www.chivalrynow.net/articles/chivalry.htm>.
Williams,
Alex. "Just Wait Until Your Mother Gets Home." Nytimes.com.
The New York Times, 12 Aug. 2012. Web. 18 Oct. 2012.
<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/fashion/dads-are-taking-over-as-full-time-parents.html?pagewanted=all>.Works
Cited
Pat,
Precious. "The Diary of a Divine Diva: Is Chivalry DEAD? And If So, Whose
FAULT Is It?" The Diary of a Divine Diva. Blogger, n.d. Web. 02
Nov. 2012.
<http://www.thediaryofadivinediva.com/2010/11/is-chivalry-dead-and-if-so-whose-fault.html>.
I think the writer should have started his proposal by stating the claim clearly before he started to analyze Carr’s claim to make his readers clear about the claim at the first read. However, I think that the writer should use Nicholas Carr’s article as an evidence to support his claim, but not analyzing and summarizing the whole article as a claim. The author’s opposing claim is clear, which is, Google is more beneficial than detrimental. The author’s points about this claim is good, but I think he should have added researched evidence to support his points, in order to make his points credible to his readers. One thing I’m unsure about is the author’s personal claim. It seems like he is trying to be the person who stays in the middle without choosing either side from two of the options. But I think for an argumentative essay, the writer should choose a side as his main argument to write about. Overall I think this proposal was systematic which is easier for me to read and understand. But the main suggestion is that the writer should add more evidence to proof that what he says is true and not merely his own opinion. Good Job!
ReplyDelete